Chambless v. Baptist Health,

Plaintiff: Kyla D Chambless
Defendant: Baptist Health,
Case Number: 6:2008cv06013
Filed: February 15, 2008
Court: Arkansas Western District Court
Office: Hot Springs Office
County: Clark
Presiding Judge: Robert T. Dawson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 9, 2009 42 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT in favor of Baptist Health, against Kyla D Chambless. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on January 9, 2009. (dmc)
December 9, 2008 23 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER denying 8 Motion for Summary Judgment. This matter remains set for jury trial on 1/5/09 in Hot Springs. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on December 9, 2008. (cap)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chambless v. Baptist Health,
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kyla D Chambless
Represented By: Q. Byrum Hurst, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Baptist Health,
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?