Looper v. Sanders et al
| Aaron Looper |
| Larry Sanders, Mel Steed, Ron Radley, Donald Ansley, Virginia Newton and Gary Dorris |
| 6:2010cv06037 |
| May 19, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| Hot Springs Office |
| Garland |
| Jimm Larry Hendren |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
JUDGMENT: For the reasons recited in a Memorandum Order and Opinion of the same date, Judgment ishereby entered in favor of Defendants and Plaintiffs Complaint, 1 , is hereby dismissedwith prejudice. Signed by Honorable Barry A. Bryant on August 22, 2011. (dmc)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 18 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Motion for Summary Judgment is denied as to Plaintiffs conditions of confinement claims regarding a lack of hot water, unusable toilets, and lack of adequate hygiene pr oducts against Defendants Radley, Ansley, and Newton. The Motion for Summary Judgment is granted regarding Plaintiffs official capacity claims; claims against Defendants Sanders, Steed, and Dorris; and the following conditions of confinement claims: no access to drinking water;padlocks on the doors; continually running water; lack of TB lights; black mold; lack of adequate clothing; lack of adequate linens; and overcrowding. Signed by Honorable Barry A. Bryant on March 10, 2011. (dmc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
