Williams v. Glenn

Plaintiff: Leo Williams, Jr.
Defendant: Preston Glenn
Case Number: 6:2010cv06041
Filed: May 28, 2010
Court: Arkansas Western District Court
Office: Hot Springs Office
County: Pike
Presiding Judge: Robert T. Dawson
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 25, 2011 17 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS in its entirety for 16 Report and Recommendations, 12 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Preston Glenn. Accordingly, Plaintiffs Complaint is DISMISSED based on Plaintiffs failure to comply with the order of the Court and his failure to prosecute this action. ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on May 25, 2011. (dmc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams v. Glenn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Leo Williams, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Preston Glenn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?