Thornton v. UPS, Inc.

Plaintiff: Brian Thornton
Defendant: UPS, Inc.
Case Number: 6:2012cv06044
Filed: April 3, 2012
Court: Arkansas Western District Court
Office: Hot Springs Office
County: Hot Spring
Presiding Judge: Susan O. Hickey
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 20, 2014 55 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 54 plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Honorable Barry A. Bryant on February 20, 2014. (sh)
January 17, 2014 49 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and granting 25 Motion for Summary Judgment. Case dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on January 17, 2014. (tg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thornton v. UPS, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brian Thornton
Represented By: James W. Stanley, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UPS, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?