Rowton v. Metlife Auto and Home Insurance Agency, Inc.
Plaintiff: Scotty Dewayne Rowton
Defendant: Metlife Auto and Home Insurance Agency, Inc.
Case Number: 6:2013cv06092
Filed: August 12, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas
Office: Hot Springs Office
County: Garland
Presiding Judge: Susan O. Hickey
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 16, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 30 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on September 16, 2014. (lw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rowton v. Metlife Auto and Home Insurance Agency, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Metlife Auto and Home Insurance Agency, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Scotty Dewayne Rowton
Represented By: Alan Jeddy Levar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?