STIPULATION AND ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz that all claims in this action between plaintiff and defendant George Dranichak shall be dismissed, with prejudice, with each of the settling parties to bear its or his own costs and attorneys fees. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.)(nhac, )

ORDER SETTING RULE 26(f) Scheduling Conference by Judge A. Howard Matz. This matter is set for a Scheduling Conference on 12/20/04 at 1:30 PM. The conference will be held pursuant to FRCP 16(b). The parties are reminded of their obligations under FRCP 26(a)(1) to disclose information... See documents for further details.(nhac, )

MINUTES: Order Discharging Further Order to Show Cause regarding Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution; Court DISCHARGES the order to show cause by Judge A. Howard Matz Court Reporter: Not Reported. (ir )

MINUTES: Further Order to Show Cause regarding Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution; Court on its own motion, now orders Plaintiff to show cause in writing no later than 9/29/04 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by Plaintiff, Court will accept a motion for default judgment or request for clerk to enter default judgment if it is filed on or before the above date. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff is due by Judge A Howard Matz Court Reporter: Not Reported. (ir )

MINUTES: Order Discharging Order to Show Cause regarding Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution; Court DISCHARGES the order to show cause. Plaintiff is again advised that if necessary, it must pursue Rule 55 remedies promptly upon default of any defendant by Judge A. Howard Matz Court Reporter: Not Reported. (ir)

MINUTES: Order to Show Cause regarding Dismissal for lack of prosecution; Court on its own motion, hereby orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing no later than 7/26/04 why this action should not be dismissed as to all remaining defendans for lack of prosecution.As an alternative to a written response by Plaintiff(s) Court will accept one of the following if it is filed on or before date as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted diligently: Proof of service of summons and complaint (applicable for defendant(s) who have not been served), In cases removed from State Court, responsive pleadings filed by all default, Request for entry of default by Plaintiff (s) (applicable where defendants have been served but not answered), motion for default judgment or request for clerk to enter default judgment; No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court; Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by Plaintiff(s) is due by Judge A. Howard Matz Court Reporter: Not Reported. (ir)

ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 224 (Related Case) filed. Transfer of case declined by Judge Lourdes G. Baird, for the reasons set forth on this order. Related Case No. CV 97-6967 LGB (SHx)(rn, )

INITIAL ORDER following filing of complaint assigned to Judge A Howard Matz by Judge A. Howard Matz (lc, )