United States of America v. Hugo Alegre

Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Hugo Alegre
Case Number: 2:2004cv03366
Filed: September 22, 2008
Court: California Central District Court
Office: Western Division - Los Angeles Office
Presiding Judge: Margaret M. Morrow
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28:2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 22, 2008 6 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that petitioner Hugo Elegre's 2255 motion be denied; and that the action be, and it hereby is, dismissed by Judge Margaret M. Morrow, in favor of United States of America against Hugo Alegre Related to: Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255) 1 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. Hugo Alegre
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hugo Alegre
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Jeremy D Matz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?