Garden City Boxing Club Inc v. Manuel Arturo Carrillo et al
Garden City Boxing Club Inc |
Manuel Arturo Carrillo and Maria Amparo Carrillo |
Creative Recovery Concepts Inc |
2:2004cv03841 |
November 21, 2014 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
Edward Rafeedie |
Patrick J. Walsh |
Other Statutory Actions |
47 U.S.C. ยง 521 Violations of Cable Communications Act of 1984 |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 24 RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT BY CLERK on behalf of Plaintiff, GARDEN CITY BOXING CLUB, INC., which was then assignee by Plaintiff to Assignee of Judgment, CREATIVE RECOVERY CONCEPTS, INC. and renewed on November 21, 2014 in favor of Assignee of Judgment, CREA TIVE RECOVERY CONCEPTS, INC. and against defendants, MANUEL ARTURO CARRILLO and MARIA AMP ARO CARRILLO, individually jointly and dba EL CAIMAN FELIZ, is hereby renewed in the following amounts: Renewal of money judgment: a. Total Judgment as last ren ewed - $4,359.93.; b. Costs after Judgment - $0.00.; c. Attorney Fees - $4,358.93.; d. Subtotal (add a and b) - $0.00.; e. Credits after judgment - $0.00.; f. Subtotal (subtract e from d) - $4,358.93.; g. Interest after judgment - $833.87.; h. Fee for filing renewal - $0.00.; TOTAL RENEWED JUDGMENT - $5,192.80. Related to: APPLICATION for Renewal of Judgment re Judgment, 21 , Default Judgment, 14 , 23 (shb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.