Jeffery D Mitchell v. A A LaMarque

Petitioner: Jeffery D Mitchell
Respondent: Warden A A LaMarque
Case Number: 2:2004cv06123
Filed: November 3, 2010
Court: California Central District Court
Office: Western Division - Los Angeles Office
Presiding Judge: Stephen V. Wilson
Referring Judge: Andrew J. Wistrich
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 3, 2010 34 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT by Judge Stephen V. Wilson Related to: Order 33 . It is hereby adjudged that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (yb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jeffery D Mitchell v. A A LaMarque
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden A A LaMarque
Represented By: Scott A Taryle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jeffery D Mitchell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?