Erick Martinez v. Michael J Astrue

Plaintiff: Erick F Martinez
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Case Number: 2:2004cv06356
Filed: May 24, 2011
Court: California Central District Court
Office: Western Division - Los Angeles Office
Referring Judge: Jennifer T. Lum
Presiding Judge: Christina A. Snyder
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 24, 2011 87 Opinion or Order of the Court MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Christina A. Snyder: On 5/23/2011, plaintiff filed an Application for Relief From Dismissal Under Rule 60(B) 86 . For the reasons set forth in this Court's order dated 12/15/2009, the Application for Relief from Dismissal Under Rule 60(b) is DENIED. Court Reporter: Not Present. (gk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Erick Martinez v. Michael J Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Represented By: Kevin Bruce Finn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Erick F Martinez
Represented By: Andrew M Schwartz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?