Augusta Millender et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
| 2:2005cv02298 |
| March 28, 2005 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dean D. Pregerson |
| Ralph Zarefsky |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
278
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 234 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson . (lc). Modified on 7/29/2013 (lc).
|
|
Filing
208
ORDER by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: denying 191 Defendants Ex Parte Application Requesting Court to Issue Order on Deferred Ruling on Defendants Motion for Summary Adjudication on Plaintiffs Monell Claim. The court will address the Monell issue based upon the Plaintiffs oral offer of proof at the pretrial conference. The Defendants may readdress the earlier motion at that time as well. (lc). Modified on 2/12/2013 (lc).
|
|
Filing
182
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION 150 , AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 151 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson (lc). Modified on 8/24/2012 (lc).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Augusta Millender et al v. County of Los Angeles et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
