Proview Technology Inc v. Maersk Sealand Featured Case
Case Number: 2:2006cv04855
Filed: August 3, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Unassigned
Nature of Suit: Other
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2012. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 25, 2007 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER DISMISSING CVIL ACTION by Judge John F. Walter: IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is hereby dismissed without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown within 60 days, to re-open the action if settlement is not consummated. (See document for further details.) (MD JS-6, Case Terminated.)(pcl, )
January 23, 2007 Filing 24 NOTICE of Settlement and REquest that the Court vacate all pending dates filed by defendants Maersk Sealand, Maersk Inc. (jj, )
January 4, 2007 Opinion or Order Filing 22 STIPULATION AND ORDER by Judge John F. Walter: The Court hereby continues the mediation deadline in this case to 1/31/2007 and continues the deadline for the parties to file a joint post-mediation status report to the court to 2/5/2007.(pcl, )
December 13, 2006 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER ON REQUEST for Approval of Substitution of Attorney Leslie G McMurray for Maersk Sealand and Maersk Inc in place and stead of attorney B Alexander Moghaddam 20 is GRANTED by Judge John F. Walter.(jp)
December 12, 2006 Filing 20 REQUEST for Approval of Substituting attorney Leslie G McMurray in place of attorney Alexander Moghaddam filed by defendants Maersk Sealand, Maersk Inc. Lodged Proposed Order. (jp)
December 8, 2006 Opinion or Order Filing 19 NOTICE OF DISCREPANCY AND ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. ORDERING Request for Approval of Substitution of Attorney/Order received on 12/6/2006 is not to be filed but instead rejected. Denial based on: No Original of Request.(jp)
December 1, 2006 Opinion or Order Filing 18 NOTICE OF DISCREPANCY AND ORDER: by Judge John F. Walter: ORDERING Request for Approval of Substitution of Attorney received on 11/30/2006 is not to be filed but instead rejected. Denial based on: No Order Submitted.(pcl, )
November 13, 2006 Filing 17 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal of Third-Party Complaint filed by Third Party Plaintiffs Maersk Sealand, Maersk Inc. Pursuant to Rule 41(c) of the FRCP Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs Maersk Sealnd and Maersk, Inc hereby voluntarily dismiss their Third-Party Complaint without prejudice. (pcl, )
October 23, 2006 Opinion or Order Filing 15 SCHEDULING AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER by Judge John F. Walter: Bench Trial set for 4/10/2007 at 08:30 AM before Judge John F. Walter. Findgings of fact and conclusions of law; hearing on motions in limine: 3/27/07. Pretrial Conference set for 3/30/2007 at 10:00 AM. Lodge Pre-trial conference order: 3/16/07. Last day for hearing motions: 2/26/07. Discovery cut-off 2/19/2007. Last date to conduct settlement conference is 1/6/2007. Last day to file Joint Report re results of Settlement Conference: 1/12/07. (mg, )
October 23, 2006 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER by Judge John F. Walter: case ordered to a private mediator to be completed no later than 1/6/2007.(pcl, )
October 23, 2006 Filing 13 MINUTES of Scheduling Conference held before Judge John F. Walter: Case called and counsel make their appearance. Plaintiffs counsel is not present. Court places matter at end of civil calendar to allow counsel time to appear. Case recalled and counsel make their appearance. Scheduling COnference held. ADR-12 is signed and filed. Court ordered the dates as indicated on Scheduling and Case Management Order filed today. Counsel served with Scheduling and Case Management Order on this date. Court Reporter: Victoria Valine. (klg, )
October 17, 2006 Filing 16 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan filed; estimated length of trial 3-days. (bp, )
October 17, 2006 Filing 12 ADR PILOT PROGRAM QUESTIONNAIRE filed by attorney Fred H Middaugh for Plaintiff Proview Technology Inc, and B Alexander Moghaddam on behalf of Defendant Maersk Sealand.(mg, )
September 21, 2006 Filing 11 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge John F. Walter: Pursuant to LR 19-1, no complaint or petition shall be filed that includes more than ten Doe or fictitiously named parties. Accordingly, the Court hereby dismisses the action as to Doe Defendants 11 through 100, inclusive. IT IS SO ORDERED. Court Reporter: None Present. (pcl, )
September 21, 2006 Opinion or Order Filing 10 STIPULATION AND ORDER by Judge John F. Walter:IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Scheduling Conference is rescheduled to 10/23/2006 at 08:30 AM. Joint Rule 26(f) Report and ADR Pilot Program Questionnaire due 10/10/2006.(pcl, )
August 22, 2006 30 DAY Summons Issued re Third Party Complaint 9 as to BNSF Railway Company, ROES 1 through 10. (pcl, )
August 18, 2006 Filing 9 THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT against Third Party Defendants BNSF Railway Company, ROES 1 through 10, filed by Third Party Plaintiffs Maersk Sealand, Maersk Inc.(pcl, )
August 14, 2006 Opinion or Order Filing 8 STANDING ORDER: READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN RESPECT FROM THE LOCAL RULES. Both the Court and counsel bear responsibility for the progress of litigation in Federal Court. To secure the just, speed, and inexpensive determination of every action, all counsel are ordered to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedures and the Local Rules of the Central District of California. (See document for further details) by Judge John F. Walter(pcl, )
August 14, 2006 Filing 7 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge John F. Walter: Scheduling Conference set for 9/25/2006 08:30 AM before Judge John F. Walter. Counsel are directed to file a Joint Rule 26(f) Report and an ADR Pilot Program Questionnaire on or before 9/18/2006. (See document for further details.) Court Reporter: None Present. (pcl, )
August 8, 2006 Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint 1 filed by defendants Maersk Sealand, Maersk Inc.(pcl, )
August 3, 2006 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF ADR PILOT PROGRAM filed.(rrey, )
August 3, 2006 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by defendants Maersk Sealand, Maersk Inc. Notice to adverse parties of removal to federal court was served on 8/3/2006. (rrey, )
August 3, 2006 Filing 3 NOTICE TO ADVERSE PARTIES OF REMOVAL TO FEDERAL COURT OF STATE COURT ACTION filed by defendants Maersk Sealand, Maersk Inc. (rrey, )
August 3, 2006 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Maersk Sealand, Maersk Inc. (rrey, )
August 3, 2006 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number NC041813 with copy of summons and complaint.Case assigned to Judge John F. Walter, Discovery to Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman. (Filing fee $ 350 ), filed by defendants Maersk Sealand, Maersk Inc.(rrey, )
August 3, 2006 FAX number for Attorney B Alexander Moghaddam is 310-315-4144. (rrey, )
August 3, 2006 FAX number for Attorney Fred H Middaugh is 562-493-5470. (rrey, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Proview Technology Inc v. Maersk Sealand
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?