Deborah Novak et al v. Warner Bros Pictures LLC et al
Plaintiff:
Deborah Novak, John Witek and Witek & Novak Inc
Defendant:
Warner Bros Pictures LLC, Thunder Road Film Productions Inc, Legendary Pictures Films LLC, Wonderland Sound and Vision Inc, Cory Helms, Jamie Linden, Mary Viola, Basil Iwanyk, MCG and Does
Case Number:
2:2007cv04000
Filed:
June 20, 2007
Court:
California Central District Court
Office:
Western Division - Los Angeles Office
County:
Los Angeles
Referring Judge:
Paul L. Abrams
Presiding Judge:
A Howard Matz
Nature of Suit:
Copyright
Cause of Action:
17:501 Copyright Infringement
Jury Demanded By:
Both
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Date Filed | # | Document Text |
|---|---|---|
| October 27, 2008 | 55 |
JUDGMENT by Judge Gary A. Feess, in favor of Legendary Pictures Films LLC, MCG, Thunder Road Film Productions Inc, Warner Bros Pictures LLC, Wonderland Sound and Vision Inc, Basil Iwanyk, Cory Helms, Jamie Linden, Mary Viola against Deborah Novak (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bp)
|
| October 10, 2007 | 12 |
ORDER Regarding Rule 26(f) Conference and Joint Report. 11/19/2007 01:30 PM before Judge Gary A. Feess.(bp)
|
| June 28, 2007 | 4 |
ORDER TO REASSIGN CASE due to self-recusal pursuant to Section 3.2 of General Order 224 by Judge A. Howard Matz. Case transferred to the calendar of Judge Gary A. Feess for all further proceedings. Case number now reads as CV 07-4000-GAF(PLAx).(tami)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
