Michael Peter Herrera v. Lydia Hense
Petitioner: Michael Peter Herrera
Respondent: Lydia C Hense
Case Number: 2:2008cv02410
Filed: October 10, 2008
Court: U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
Office: Western Division - Los Angeles Office
Presiding Judge: Carolyn Turchin
Presiding Judge: John F. Walter
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 10, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 24 JUDGMENT by Judge John F. Walter: IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (pcl)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Michael Peter Herrera v. Lydia Hense
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Lydia C Hense
Represented By: Sarah Jean Farhat
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Michael Peter Herrera
Represented By: Marilee Marshall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?