Amanda Kennedy et al v. United States Marine Corps. et al
Peter Kennedy and Amanda Kennedy |
United States Marine Corps., United States of America and DOES |
2:2008cv02988 |
May 7, 2008 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
XX US, Outside California |
Gary A. Feess |
Oswald Parada |
Federal Employer's Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 Tort Claim |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 74 JUDGMENT BY COURT WITHOUT A JURY: It is ordered that the plaintiff AMANDA KENNEDY recover from the defendant UNITED STATES OF AMERICA the amount of $2,201,891.00 and plaintiff PETER KENNEDY recover from the defendant UNITED STATES OF AMERICA the amount of $11,168.62, with post judgment interest, according to the Court's minute order and conditions stated herein, at the rate of 3.6%, along with costs to be determined by the Clerk of Court by Judge Gary A. Feess, in favor of Amanda Kennedy against United States of America (bp) |
Filing 68 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW signed by Judge Gary A. Feess. Plaintiff Amanda Kennedy is awarded damages in the total sum of $2,201,891. Plaintiff Peter Kennedy is awarded damages in the total sum of $11,168.62. Plaintiff is to prepare and submit to the Court a Proposed Judgment no later than Monday, October 19, 2009 (bp) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.