Integrated Sports Media, Inc. v. Winston Robinson Burgo et al
| Integrated Sports Media, Inc. |
| Winston Robinson Burgo, Jorge Ivan Lavin, Arturo Velaquez and Latin Fusion, Inc. |
| 2:2008cv06893 |
| October 20, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| XX US, Outside California |
| Cooper |
| Kenton |
| Cable/Satellite TV |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
70
RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT BY CLERK in favor of Plaintiff, Integrated Sports Media Inc, and against Defendant, Winston Robinson Burgo, Jorge Ivan Lavin (individually and dab Canoas Banquet Hall aka La Tortilla Loca) and Latin Fusion, Inc., (an unknown busin ess entity dba Canoas Banquet Hall aka La Tortilla Loca), entered on July 30, 2009, be and the same is hereby renewed in the amounts as set forth below: Renewal of money judgment: a. Total judgment $11,200.00. b. Costs after judgment $00. 00. c. Subtotal (add a and b) $11,200.00. d. Credits $00.00. e. Subtotal (subtract d from c) $11,200.00. f. Interest after judgment (rate.47% per annum)$522.65. g. Fee for filing renewal of application $00.00. h. Total renewed judgment (add e, f and g) $11,722.65. Related to: APPLICATION for Renewal of Judgment re Order on Motion for Default Judgment,, 25 , 69 . (shb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
