Joseph Grimes v. LA Sheriff's Department et al
||LA Sheriff's Department, Vross and Zavilla
||December 17, 2008
||US District Court for the Central District of California
||Western Division - Los Angeles Office
|Nature of Suit:
||Prisoner: Civil Rights
|Cause of Action:
||28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|November 5, 2014
ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge John F. Walter, re Notice of Settlement 242 . In the Notice of Settlement filed on November 5, 2014, Dkt. No. 242, the parties represent that they have settled this action. As a result, the Court dismisses this acti on without prejudice subject to either party reopening the action on or before March 5, 2015. The Court will retain jurisdiction for the sole purpose of enforcing the settlement until March 5, 2015. Thereafter, absent further order of the Court, the Clerk is ordered to dismiss this action with prejudice. All dates in this action, including the trial date are vacated. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (kss)
|May 9, 2013
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge John F. Walter for Report and Recommendation (Issued), 183 . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Firs t Amended Complaint, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Plaintiff has objected. The Court accepts the Report and adopts it as its own findings and conclusions. (ca)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?