Derrick L. Harding v. Kathleen Dickinson
Petitioner: Derrick L. Harding
Respondent: Kathleen Dickinson
Case Number: 2:2009cv02203
Filed: March 30, 2009
Court: U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
Office: Western Division - Los Angeles Office
County: Solano
Presiding Judge: Real
Presiding Judge: Turchin
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 14, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 19 JUDGMENT by Judge Manuel L. Real: Pursuant to the Order Accepting Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation 18 , IT IS ADJUDGED that the petition is denied and dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (pcl)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Derrick L. Harding v. Kathleen Dickinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Kathleen Dickinson
Represented By: Amanda Lloyd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Derrick L. Harding
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?