Anthony Walker v. Lydia C. Hense

Anthony Walker v. Lydia C. Hense

Petitioner:	Anthony Neal Walker
Respondent:	Lydia C. Hense
Case Number:	2:2009cv02228
Filed:	March 31, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Office:	Western Division - Los Angeles Office
County:	Kern
Presiding Judge:	Chapman
Presiding Judge:	Matz
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 21, 2010	Filing 24 JUDGMENT by Judge A. Howard Matz, Pursuant to the Order of the Court adopting the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Rosalyn M. Chapman,IT IS ADJUDGED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus and action are dismissed without prejudice (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jy)
January 20, 2010	Filing 23 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge A. Howard Matz; IT IS ORDERED that (1) the Report and Recommendation is approved and adopted; (2) the Report and Recommendation is adopted as the findings of fact and conclusions of law herein; (3) respondents motion to dismiss is granted, and the Court finds petitioner has failed to exhaust his state court remedies; and (4) Judgment shall be entered dismissing the petition and action without prejudice. See order for further details. (jy)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 21, 2010

Filing 24 JUDGMENT by Judge A. Howard Matz, Pursuant to the Order of the Court adopting the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Rosalyn M. Chapman,IT IS ADJUDGED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus and action are dismissed without prejudice (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jy)

January 20, 2010

Filing 23 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge A. Howard Matz; IT IS ORDERED that (1) the Report and Recommendation is approved and adopted; (2) the Report and Recommendation is adopted as the findings of fact and conclusions of law herein; (3) respondents motion to dismiss is granted, and the Court finds petitioner has failed to exhaust his state court remedies; and (4) Judgment shall be entered dismissing the petition and action without prejudice. See order for further details. (jy)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Anthony Walker v. Lydia C. Hense
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Lydia C. Hense
Represented By:	Blythe J Leszkay
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Anthony Neal Walker
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?