Anthony Phillips Cosme v. LASD/Chavez et al
| Anthony Phillips Cosme |
| Los Angeles Sheriff Dept, Chavez, West and County of Los Angeles |
| 2:2009cv02363 |
| April 6, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| XX US, Outside California |
| Snyder |
| Nagle |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
JUDGMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder: IT IS ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (am)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER DISMISSING FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND by Magistrate Judge David T Bristow: If plaintiff still desires to pursue this action, he is ORDERED to file a Second Amended Complaint within thirty (30) days of the service date of this O rder, remedying the deficiencies discussed above. The clerk is directed to send plaintiff a blank Central District civil rights complaint form, which plaintiff is encouraged to utilize. If plaintiff chooses to file a Second Amended Complaint, it should bear the docket number assigned in this case; be labeled Second Amended Complaint; and be complete in and of itself without reference to the original Complaint, the FAC, or any other pleading, attachment or document. (am)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
