Bruce Lisker v. City of Los Angeles et al
2:2009cv09374 |
December 22, 2009 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Chapman |
Matz |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 449 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO CERTIFY INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL 445 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. (lc). Modified on 1/27/2014. (lc). |
Filing 444 ORDER VACATING ALL TRIAL AND ASSOCIATED PRETRIAL DATES PENDING RESOLUTION OF APPEAL. Within 7 days of the entry of the mandate on the docket, the parties shall file a joint report setting forth a brief summary of this litigation to date; the effect the outcome of the appeal will have on the case; and proposed expedited motion-in-limine hearing, pretrial conference, and trial dates by Judge Otis D. Wright, II:. (lc). Modified on 5/13/2013. (lc). Modified on 5/13/2013 (lc). |
Filing 443 ORDER STRIKING EX PARTE APPLICATION 438 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court therefore DENIES Plaintiff's application. Plaintiff may refile his request as a regularly noticed motion, but only after reinitiating Local Rule 7-3's meet-and-confer procedures and fully complying with both the letter and spirit of that Rule. (bp) |
Filing 408 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge A. Howard Matz: Before the Court is the Motion in Limine # 6 of Plaintiff Bruce Lisker. Lisker moves this Court to rule that the trial testimony of Robert Lisker (Plaintiff's father), the trial testimony of Robert Johnson (a friend of the Lisker family), and the deposition testimony of former LAPD Deputy Chief Michael Berkow are not excludable on hearsay grounds. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion 223 . (See Minute Order for further details). (jp) |
Filing 372 MINUTE IN CHAMBERS by Judge A. Howard Matz: On 1/9/2012, this Court ordered Plaintiff to file a declaration authenticating Exhibit 613, filed in support of Plaintiff's Motion in Limine #3. (Trans. 1/09/12, Dkt. 278 at 6:20-7:6.) To date, the Court has yet to receive any such declaration. Plaintiff is ORDERED to file a declaration in compliance with this Courts previous order by no later than 7/24/2012. (jp) |
Filing 319 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge A. Howard Matz: denying Defendants' Motion in Limine #14 to trifurcate the trial into three phases 272 . Because the Court finds that Plaintiff's due process and Brady claims are inextricably intertwined with the question of his innocence or guilt, the Court DENIES Defendants' motion for trifurcation. The Court will, however, modify its August 11, 2011, order 246 and will bifurcate the trial into two phases. (kbr) |
Filing 318 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz: granting Motion In Limine Regarding The Burden And Allocation Of Proof As To Defendants' Affirmative Damages Defense 314 . (kbr) |
Filing 276 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge A. Howard Matz: The five elements of a false evidence claim that Plaintiff lists on page 4 of the Response must be proven in the liability phase. The Court will decide whether to trifurcate Plaintiffs Monell claim when it rules on Defendants Motion in Limine #14. (se) |
Filing 174 ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER OF CDCR RECORDS OF ROBERT HUGHES by Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Wistrich, re: Stipulation for Protective Order, 171 . (mz) |
Filing 173 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge A. Howard Matz: The Court DENIES without prejudice Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment 90 . Defendants may renew that motion or file a different and presumably far more streamlined and focused motion sometime before trial, but after the motions in limine have been decided. (jp) |
Filing 164 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz. The Court GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss 57 and dismisses claims two and three without prejudice. (kbr) |
Filing 140 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge A. Howard Matz: This action is before the Court on Plaintiff Motion for an Order Allowing Him to Retain Professor Richard Leo as a Consultant or Expert Witness 46 . (See attached Minute Order for further details). Acco rdingly, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff Unopposed Motion to Hire Professor Leo, under the condition that Professor Leo is forbidden from disclosing to Plaintiff any confidential information regarding this case that he may have obtained from the City. No hearing is necessary. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; L.R. 7-15. (jp) |
Filing 36 PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Rosalyn M. Chapman re Stipulation for Protective Order 33 ; See order for details. Note changes made by the Court. (jy) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Bruce Lisker v. City of Los Angeles et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.