RE/MAX, LLC v. RE/MAX Empire, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: RE/MAX, LLC
Defendant: RE/MAX Empire, Inc., Eraline Terrones, Walter Terrones and Hector Vasquez
Case Number: 2:2010cv04517
Filed: June 18, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Stephen J. Hillman
Presiding Judge: A. Howard Matz
Nature of Suit: Trademark

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 5, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 16 AMENDED CONSENT ORDER AND JUDGMENT by Judge A. Howard Matz. Judgment is entered against Defendant Vasquez for trademark counterfeiting, trademark infringement, unfair competition, and dilution of a famous mark under the laws of the United States, Tit le 15, USC (Counts I-IV); for trademark infringement under Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code section 14200 et seq.(Count V); for unfair competition under Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200 (Count VI); and trademark infringement, and unfair competition under th e common law of the state of California (Counts VII-VIII). A Permanent Injunction is Ordered, effective immediately, enjoining. Defendant Vasquez shall pay to RE/MAX a reasonable royalty for his infringement of the RE/MAX Trademarks in the amount of $3,625.68. Vasquez shall submit payment in full within forty five (45) days from the date of signing of this Consent Order and Judgment. RE/MAX shall be entitled to its costs and attorneys fees expended in pursuing compliance with or seeking enf orcement of any provision of the Final Judgment and Permanent Injunction Against Defendant Vasquez. (See attached Amended Consent for further information). The Court retains jurisdiction over this matter and the parties to this action in order to enforce any violation of the terms of this Final Judgment and Permanent Injunction Against Defendant Vasquez by a finding of contempt. (jp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: RE/MAX, LLC v. RE/MAX Empire, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RE/MAX Empire, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Eraline Terrones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Walter Terrones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hector Vasquez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: RE/MAX, LLC
Represented By: Nadya C Bosch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?