Sochil Triana Cruz v. Dawn Davidson
Petitioner: Sochil Triana Cruz
Respondent: Dawn Davidson
Case Number: 2:2010cv05007
Filed: July 8, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Dale S. Fischer
Presiding Judge: Margaret A. Nagle
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 13, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Dale S. Fischer for Report and Recommendation (Issued), 3 . (mz)
August 24, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 6 JUDGMENT by Judge Dale S. Fischer, in favor of Dawn Davidson against Sochil Triana Cruz Related to: R&R Adopting Report and Recommendations 5 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ec)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sochil Triana Cruz v. Dawn Davidson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Sochil Triana Cruz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Dawn Davidson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?