Encompass Insurance Company et al v. Farmers Insurance Exchange et al
| Encompass Insurance Company, Continental Insurance Company and Glens Falls Insurance Company |
| Does, Farmers Insurance Exchange, Coast National Insurance Company and Mid-Century Insurance Company |
| Michael M Pollak |
| 2:2010cv06421 |
| August 27, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| George H. King |
| Patrick J. Walsh |
| Insurance |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
76
JUDGMENT by Judge George H. King: Pursuant to the Courts April 2, 2012 Order 75 , IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that Plaintiffs Encompass Insurance Company and Glens Falls Insurance Companys ("Plaintiffs") claims against Defendants Mid-Century Insurance Company and Coast National Insurance Company are DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintiffs shall take nothing by this Complaint.(MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ir)
|
|
Filing
18
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge George H. King: Proceedings: Order to Show Cause. Plaintiffs shall have a further twelve (12) days hereof to show cause, in writing, why this matter should not be dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Failure to timely and adequately show cause shall be deemed Plaintiffs' admission that we lack subject matter jurisdiction over this action. In that event, this action will be dismissed without prejudice. (mg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
