Givenchy S.A. v. BCBG Max Azria Group, Inc. Featured Case
Plaintiff: Givenchy S.A.
Defendant: BCBG Max Azria Group, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2010cv08394
Filed: November 4, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Stephen J. Hillman
Presiding Judge: George H. King
Nature of Suit: Trademark
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2011. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 16, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 19 PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman (sbu)
February 16, 2011 Filing 18 NOTICE OF LODGING filed of [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER re Complaint - (Discovery), Complaint - (Discovery) 1 (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order [PROPOSED] Protective Order)(Keats, Anthony)
February 16, 2011 Filing 17 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Plaintiff Givenchy S.A.. correcting Notice of Lodging 14 of [Proposed] Protective Order (Keats, Anthony)
February 15, 2011 Filing 14 NOTICE OF LODGING filed of [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER re Complaint - (Discovery), Complaint - (Discovery) 1 (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order [Proposed] Protective Order)(Keats, Anthony)
February 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER RE: SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS by Judge George H. King: A deadline for dispositive motions has been set in the above-captioned case. Any motion(s) for summary judgment SHALL comply with all Federal and Local Rules, as well as this Order. Please be advised that this Order contains requirements more specific than the Local and Federal Rules. (see document for further details) (bm)
February 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS VACATING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND ENTERING SCHEDULING DATES by Judge George H. King: This matter is before us for scheduling conference on Monday, February 14, 2011. We have considered the Report of Parties' Planning Meeting and determine that an in-person scheduling conference is unnecessary. Accordingly, the scheduling conference is hereby VACATED and TAKEN OFF CALENDAR. We now enter the following scheduling order: 1. Any stipulation or motion to amend as to any claims, defenses and/or parties shall be lodged/filed by no later than March 11, 2011, failing which it shall be deemed that party's waiver of any such amendments in this action. 2. All fact discovery shall be COMPLETED by no later than July 29, 2011. Completion means that any discovery that is not received in hand by the requesting party by the completion date will be denied. If any discovery motions are necessary, the parties shall ensure that they are calendared and heard by the magistrate judge sufficiently in advance of the completion date to permit actual production, by the completion date, of any discovery the judge might order. 3. The parties shall designate their expert witnesses, if any, and make the required disclosures by no later than July 29, 2011, and do likewise for any rebuttal expert witnesses by no later than August 19, 2011. 4. All expert discovery shall be COMPLETED by no later than September 16, 2011. 5. The parties shall comply with Local Rule 16-15 by no later than September 30, 2011. The parties elect to go to private mediation. We approve this election. If the case settles, counsel shall notify the court clerk forthwith. If the case does not settle, counsel shall file a joint status report with the court within 48 hours of termination of settlement discussions. 6. Any motion for summary judgment shall be filed in compliance with the Local Rules, as well as our Order Re: Summary Judgment Motions issued concurrently herewith, by no later than November 4, 2011, and noticed for hearing thereafter regularly under the Local Rules. Any untimely or non-conforming motion will be denied. 7. The court will set pre-trial conference and trial dates, if necessary, after resolution of the summary judgment motion(s). (bm)
February 11, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge George H. King: On the Court's own motion, the above matter set on calendar for scheduling conference on Monday, February 14, 2011 is hereby TAKEN OFF CALENDAR. The hearing date is VACATED. No appearance by counsel is necessary. The Court will issue such orders as deemed appropriate. (bm)
January 31, 2011 Filing 12 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan Joint Report of Parties' Planning Meeting Pursuant to Rule 26(f) ; estimated length of trial 5 days, filed by Plaintiff Givenchy S.A... (Keats, Anthony)
December 13, 2010 Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Givenchy S.A., upon Defendant BCBG Max Azria Group, Inc. served on 11/12/2010, answer due 12/3/2010. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Margaret Wilson, C T Corporation, person/agent authorized to accept service of process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity. Original Summons NOT returned. (Gatien, Konrad)
December 3, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge George H. King, READ IMMEDIATELY. (PLEASE REVIEW DOCUMENT FOR FULL AND COMPLETE DETAILS) Scheduling Conference set for FEBRUARY 14, 2011 at 1:30 PM before Judge George H. King at the Roybal Federal Building and Courthouse, 255 E. Temple Street, Suite 650, Los Angeles, California. By no later than JANUARY 14, 2011, counsel for all appearing parties and all unrepresented appearing parties, if any, shall meet, in person, and discuss the matters set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f). REPORT OF PARTIES PLANNING MEETING by no later than JANUARY 31, 2011, counsel for all appearing parties and all unrepresented appearing parties, if any, shall file a joint "REPORT OF PARTIES' PLANNING MEETING" which shall (1) be so labeled, (2) state the date of the Scheduling Conference set above by this Order, and (3) address not only those subjects in Rule 26(f)) (PLEASE REFER TO ORDER FOR FULL AND COMPLETE DETAILS) (lw)
November 30, 2010 Filing 9 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant BCBG Max Azria Group, Inc. identifying None as Corporate Parent. (Alterwitz, Erica)
November 30, 2010 Filing 8 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant BCBG Max Azria Group, Inc., (Alterwitz, Erica)
November 30, 2010 Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), Complaint - (Discovery) 1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant BCBG Max Azria Group, Inc..(Alterwitz, Erica)
November 15, 2010 Filing 6 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Givenchy S.A., re Order 4 Re: Case Management served on 11/12/10. (Gatien, Konrad)
November 10, 2010 Filing 5 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Givenchy S.A.to Notice To Counsel Re: Copyright/Patent/Trademark (CV-31) 3 Correcting Civil Cover Sheet Case Designation (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Response to Notice to Counsel-EXHIBIT 1)(Gatien, Konrad)
November 9, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT by Judge George H. King, This case has been assigned to the calendar of Judge George H. King. (PLEASE REVIEW DOCUMENT FOR FULL AND COMPLETE DETAILS) (lw)
November 4, 2010 Filing 3 NOTICE TO COUNSEL RE: Copyright, Patent and Trademark Reporting Requirements. Counsel shall file the appropriate AO-120 and/or AO-121 form with the Clerk within 10 days. (et)
November 4, 2010 Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Givenchy S.A. (et) (mg).
November 4, 2010 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendant BCBG Max Azria Group, Inc. Case assigned to Judge George H. King for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman. (Filing fee $ 350 PAID.), filed by Plaintiff Givenchy S.A. (et) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/5/2010: # 1 Ntc of Asgmt) (mg).
November 4, 2010 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery) 1 as to Defendant BCBG Max Azria Group, Inc. (et)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Givenchy S.A. v. BCBG Max Azria Group, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BCBG Max Azria Group, Inc.
Represented By: Erica Suzanne Alterwitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Givenchy S.A.
Represented By: David K Caplan
Represented By: Konrad Karl Gatien
Represented By: Anthony M Keats
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?