B. Aronson Inc. et al v. Bradshaw International, Inc. et al
Bruce Aronson, Phebe Aronson, B. Aronson Inc. and PB and J Consulting Corp. |
Michael Rodrigue, Douglas J. Bradshaw, Bradshaw International, Inc. and Does |
2:2011cv00531 |
January 18, 2011 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Suzanne H. Segal |
Christina A. Snyder |
Contract: Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 63 PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal re Stipulation for Protective Order 62 ; See order for details. (jy) |
Filing 58 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: PARTIES' STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal; The Court is unable to adopt the Protective Order as stipulated to by the parties for the following reasons: First, a protective order must be na rrowly tailored and cannot be overbroad. Second, the Protective Order does not establish the requisite good cause. Third, the Court reminds the parties that all future discovery documents filed with the Court shall include the following in the caption: [Discovery Document: Referred to Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal]. Finally, the Court notes that its website contains additional guidance regarding protective orders. IT IS SO ORDERED. See order for details. (jy) |
Filing 26 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Christina A. Snyder: The Court DENIES Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Second and Third Claims in Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint 23 . Court Reporter: Not Present. (gk) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.