Michael Badgley et al v. Litton Loan Servicing, LP et al
| Julieta Badgley and Michael Badgley |
| Doe Defendants 1 through 10 and Litton Loan Servicing, LP |
| 2:2011cv01378 |
| February 14, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Audrey B. Collins |
| Patrick J. Walsh |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: JURISDICTION by Judge Audrey B. Collins: Defendant is hereby ORDERED to SHOW CAUSE in writing no later than Monday, March 7, 2011, why this Court should not remand this case back to state court for la ck of jurisdiction. The form of response may be either an amended notice of removal in which the diversity of the parties is sufficiently alleged, or a separate writing. The failure to file a response by the deadline ordered herein shall be deemed De fendant's consent to the remand of this action. In that case, the Court shall remand the action without further notice. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is hereby CONTINUED to April 11, 2011, at 10:00 a.m. to permit the Court to resolve the OSC. If the OSC is vacated, Plaintiff's Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss will be due no later than March 21, 2011, and Defendant's Reply will be due no later than March 28, 2011. (lw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
