James Estakhrian v. Mark Obenstine et al
| James Estakhrian |
| Terry A Coffing, Benjamin F Easterlin, IV, King and Spalding, LLP, Marquis and Aurbach, PC and Mark Obenstine |
| 2:2011cv03480 |
| April 22, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Gary A. Feess |
| Carla Woehrle |
| Contract: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
653
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE CONTEMPT by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Mark Obenstine shall appear before this court, in person, on Thursday, February 27, 2020, at 10:00 a.m. *See Order for dates and requirements.* (iv)
|
|
Filing
640
JUDGMENT by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Pursuant to the Court's Order Re: Attorney's Fees & Costs, filed contemporaneously with the filing of this Judgment, IT IS ADJUDGED THAT class counsel shall be paid $3.6 million in attorneys fees and $30,704.74 in costs from the common fund. (iv)
|
|
Filing
622
JUDGMENT by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Judgment shall be entered in favor of plaintiffs on their claims for (1) breach of fiduciary duty; (2) violation of the California Unfair Competition Law, Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code 17200,et seq.; and (5) violation of the California Consumers Legal Remedies Act, Cal. Civil Code 1750, et seq. Defendant Mark Obenstine shall disgorge and pay as restitution to the class members the amount of twelve (12) million dollars he received as attorney's fees in the Watt litigation. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (iv)
|
|
Filing
534
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION RE: COMMUNICATIONS WITH CLASS MEMBERS by Judge Fernando M. Olguin that Plaitniffs Ex Parte Application for Temporary Restraining Order and Order to Show Cause Why a Preliminary Injunction Should Not issue (Document No. 523 ) i s GRANTED. A Preliminary Injunction shall issue as set forth below. Defendant Mark Obenstine, along with his attorneys, officers, employees, agents, licensees, relatives, representatives, and all other persons or entities acting or purporting to act on his behalf are prohibited from communicating with any class member in the above-referenced action without prior authorization from the court. No later than 6/27/2017, Mark Obenstine shall file a detailed declaration under penalty of perjury disclosing any and all communications with class members during the pendency of this action. (jp)
|
|
Filing
491
JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV.P. 54(b) by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. IT IS ADJUDGED THAT: (1) Defendants shall pay plaintiff James Estakhrian a service award of $7,500 and plaintiff Abdi Naziri a service award of $2,500 in accordance with the terms of the Settlement Agreement. (2) Defendants shall pay class counsel attorney fees in the amount of $1,156,250 and costs in the amount of $136,202.44 in accordance with the terms of the Settlement Agreement. (3) The Claims Admini strator, A.B. Data, shall be paid for its fees and expenses in connection with the administration of the Settlement Agreement, in accordance with the terms of the Settlement Agreement. (4) The National Consumer Law Center, as the cy pres beneficiary, shall receive any unclaimed settlement funds, in accordance with the terms of the Settlement Agreement. (5) Except as to any class members who have validly and timely requested exclusion, the claims against defendants Benjamin F. Easterlin and King and Spalding, LLC are hereby dismissed with prejudice. (jp)
|
|
Filing
445
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Show Cause Hearing set for 4/21/2016 at 10:00 AM before Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (vdr)
|
|
Filing
208
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER GOVERNING USE AND DISCLOSURE OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION by Magistrate Judge Carla Woehrle. Food cause having been shown for the necessity of a Protective Order in this matter, it is hereby ordered that the terms of the Stipulated Protective Order Governing Use and Disclosure of Confidential Information be followed as specified in that Stipulated Protective order. (205) (gr)
|
|
Filing
195
ORDER GRANTING CONFIDENTIALITY STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Carla Woehrle. On reading the Confidentiality Stipulation and Protective Order and good cause appearing, IT IS SO ORDERED. (194) (gr)
|
|
Filing
70
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Carla Woehrle re Stipulation for Protective Order 67 . **SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS** (dt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
