Kim Kardashian v. The Gap Inc et al
Plaintiff Kim Kardashian alleged that Defendants used her likeness, identity and persona in the form of a celebrity look-alike in advertisements for Defendants' products without her consent.
| Kim Kardashian |
| Does, Gap Apparel LLC, Old Navy Apparel LLC, Old Navy LLC and The Gap Inc |
| 2:2011cv05960 |
| July 20, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dale S. Fischer |
| Margaret A. Nagle |
| Other Statutory Actions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2011. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER by Judge Dale S. Fischer. Read this order carefully as it controls this case and differs in some respects from the Local Rules. (vdr)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF ADR PROGRAM filed.(car) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Kim Kardashian (car) (ds). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1-10, Gap Apparel LLC, Old Navy Apparel LLC, Old Navy LLC, The Gap Inc.Case assigned to Judge Dale S. Fischer for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Margaret A Nagle.(Filing fee $ 350 PAID) Jury Demanded, filed by plaintiff Kim Kardashian. [NO SUMMONS ISSUED](car) Modified on 7/20/2011 (car). (ds). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
