Mark Alan Abrams v. United States of America Featured Case

Petitioner: Mark Alan Abrams
Respondent: United States of America
Case Number: 2:2011cv07012
Filed: August 25, 2011
Court: California Central District Court
Presiding Judge: Dean D. Pregerson
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2012. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed#Document Text
August 25, 2011 2 MEMORANDUM of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255) 1 filed by Petitioner Mark Alan Abrams. (et)
August 25, 2011 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 USC 2255 assigned to Judge Dean D. Pregerson. For docketing entries refer to CR Case # 2:06-cr-044 DDP, filed by Petitioner Mark Alan Abrams. (et)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mark Alan Abrams v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Mark Alan Abrams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Represented By: Dorothy Kim
Represented By: Jeremy D Matz
Represented By: Assistant 2241-2255 US Attorney LA-CR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?