Brittney Cooper v. Starbucks Corporation Featured Case
Petitioner: Brittney Cooper
Respondent: Starbucks Corporation
Case Number: 2:2011cv07982
Filed: September 27, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Gary A. Feess
Presiding Judge: Patrick J. Walsh
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 13, 2012. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 27, 2011 Filing 34 NOTICE OF RECEIPT OF CASE TRANSFERRED IN: Formerly Case Number: 5:11-CV-03268 PSG from USDC, Northern District of California (San Jose).The above-referenced case has been transferred to this district and assigned the Civil Case Number: CV 11-7982 JFW (SSx). (ghap)
September 27, 2011 Filing 33 ORIGINAL file, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received from California Northern
September 23, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 31 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 25 MOTION to Dismiss Or, in the Alternative, MOTION to Transfer Case to the Central District of California filed by Starbucks Corporation. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on 9/23/2011. (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/23/2011) [Transferred from California Northern on 9/27/2011.]
September 16, 2011 Filing 30 STIPULATION To Transfer Case to the Central District of California and [Proposed] Order Thereon by Starbucks Corporation. (Curiel, Mark) (Filed on 9/16/2011) [Transferred from California Northern on 9/27/2011.]
September 9, 2011 Filing 29 First Amended Alleged Class Action COMPLAINT against Starbucks Corporation. Filed byBrittney Cooper. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (Blumenthal, Norman) (Filed on 9/9/2011) Modified on 9/14/2011 (bw, COURT STAFF). [Transferred from California Northern on 9/27/2011.]
September 8, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER by Judge Paul S. Grewal granting 20 Motion for Leave to File FAC (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/8/2011) [Transferred from California Northern on 9/27/2011.]
September 6, 2011 Filing 27 Statement of Non-Opposition re Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint re 20 filed by Starbucks Corporation. (Curiel, Mark) (Filed on 9/6/2011) Text modified on 9/7/2011 (bw, COURT STAFF). [Transferred from California Northern on 9/27/2011.]
September 2, 2011 Filing 25 Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Or, in the Alternative, to Transfer Case to the Central District of California filed by Starbucks Corporation. Motion Hearing set for 10/11/2011 10:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 4th Floor, San Jose before Magistrate Judge Paul Singh Grewal. Responses due by 9/16/2011. Replies due by 9/23/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Mark Curiel in Support of Defendant Starbucks Corporation's Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, to Transfer Case to the Central District of California, # 2 Exhibit A to Declaration of Mark Curiel in Support of Defendant Starbucks Corporation's Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, to Transfer Case to the Central District of California, # 3 Exhibit B to Declaration of Mark Curiel in Support of Defendant Starbucks Corporation's Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, to Transfer Case to the Central District of California, # 4Exhibit C to Declaration of Mark Curiel in Support of Defendant Starbucks Corporation's Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, to Transfer Case to the Central District of California, # 5 Exhibit D to Declaration of Mark Curiel in Support of Defendant Starbucks Corporation's Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, to Transfer Case to the Central District of California, # 6 Exhibit E to Declaration of Mark Curiel in Support of Defendant Starbucks Corporation's Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, to Transfer Case to the Central District of California, # 7 Exhibit F to Declaration of Mark Curiel in Support of Defendant Starbucks Corporation's Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, to Transfer Case to the Central District of California, # 8 Exhibit G to Declaration of Mark Curiel in Support of Defendant Starbucks Corporation's Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, to Transfer Case to the Central District of California, # 9 Exhibit H to Declaration of Mark Curiel in Support of Defendant Starbucks Corporation's Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, to Transfer Case to the Central District of California, # 10 (Proposed) Order Granting Defendant Starbucks Corporation's Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, to Transfer Case to the Central District of California)(Curiel, Mark) (Filed on 9/2/2011) Text modified on 9/6/2011 (bw, COURT STAFF). [Transferred from California Northern on 9/27/2011.]
August 30, 2011 ***Deadlines terminated. 26 Status Conference held. (ofr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/30/2011) [Transferred from California Northern on 9/27/2011.]
August 30, 2011 Filing 26 Minute Entry: Status Conference held. Defendant plans to file motion to dismiss or transfer by the end of the week. Parties awaiting ruling on York v. Starbucks matter currently under submission in the Central District of California. Plaintiffs motion for leave to file amended complaint presently set for 9/27/11 before Judge Grewal. Parties to update the court with a 1-2 page joint cover letter reflecting any ruling issued on York v. Starbucks matter. Pretrial and trial schedule deferred pending ruling on pending motions and submission of ruling on York v. Starbucks matter. (Date Filed: 8/30/2011). (Court Reporter FTR: (2:31 to 2:37.) (ofr, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 8/30/2011) [Transferred from California Northern on 9/27/2011.]
August 25, 2011 Filing 24 Request for Counsel to Partcipate in Case Management Conference by Telephone; (Proposed) Order filed by Brittney Cooper. (Attachments: # 1 Proof of service)(Bhowmik, Aparajit) (Filed on 8/25/2011) Text modified on 8/31/2011 (bw, COURT STAFF). [Transferred from California Northern on 9/27/2011.]
August 25, 2011 Filing 23 Request for Counsel to Participate in Further Case Management Conference by Telephone filed by Starbucks Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 (Proposed) Order) (Knopp, Gregory) (Filed on 8/25/2011) Text modified on 8/31/2011 conforming to posted document caption (bw, COURT STAFF). [Transferred from California Northern on 9/27/2011.]
August 23, 2011 Filing 22 JOINT STATUS CONFERENCE STATEMENT filed by Starbucks Corporation. (Curiel, Mark) (Filed on 8/23/2011) Modified on 8/24/2011 (bw, COURT STAFF). [Transferred from California Northern on 9/27/2011.]
August 23, 2011 Filing 21 Declaration of Aparajit Bhowmik in Support of Motion for Leave to File a First Amended Complaint re 20 filed by Brittney Cooper. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (Bhowmik, Aparajit) (Filed on 8/23/2011) Modified on 8/24/2011 (bw, COURT STAFF). [Transferred from California Northern on 9/27/2011.]
August 23, 2011 Filing 20 Notice of Motion and Motion for Leave to File a First Amended Complaint filed by Brittney Cooper. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities, # 2 Declaration of Aparajit Bhowmik, # 3 (Proposed) Order, # 4 Certificate/Proof of Service) (Bhowmik, Aparajit) (Filed on 8/23/2011) Modified on 8/24/2011 (bw, COURT STAFF). [Transferred from California Northern on 9/27/2011.]
August 4, 2011 Filing 19 ADR Certification by Parties and Counsel (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (Mukherjee, Ruchira) (Filed on 8/4/2011) Modified on 8/4/2011 (bw, COURT STAFF). [Transferred from California Northern on 9/27/2011.]
July 26, 2011 Filing 18 Minute Entry: Case Management Conference held on 7/26/2011 before Magistrate Judge Paul S. Grewal (Date Filed: 7/26/2011). Status Conference set for 8/30/2011 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 5, 4th Floor, San Jose before Magistrate Judge Paul Singh Grewal. Parties to submit joint status statement no later than 8/23/2011. Discovery is stayed through 8/30/2011. (Court Reporter FTR: (2:03 to 2:13.) (ofr, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 7/26/2011) [Transferred from California Northern on 9/27/2011.]
July 26, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 17 Case Management ORDER. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on July 26, 2011. (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/26/2011) [Transferred from California Northern on 9/27/2011.]
July 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER GRANTING 14 15 REQUESTS TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on July 22, 2011. (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2011) [Transferred from California Northern on 9/27/2011.]
July 21, 2011 Filing 15 Request for Counsel to Participate in Initial Case Management Conference By Telephone by Starbucks Corporation (Attachments: # 1 (Proposed) Order)(Knopp, Gregory) (Filed on 7/21/2011) Modified on 7/22/2011 (bw, COURT STAFF). [Transferred from California Northern on 9/27/2011.]
July 21, 2011 Filing 14 Request for Counsel to Participate in Initial Case Management Conference by Telephone; and [Proposed] Order (Attachments: # 1 Proof of Service)(Bhowmik, Aparajit) (Filed on 7/21/2011) Modified on 7/21/2011 Incorrect event type used when posting document (bw, COURT STAFF). [Transferred from California Northern on 9/27/2011.]
July 19, 2011 Filing 13 JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT filed by Starbucks Corporation. (Curiel, Mark) (Filed on 7/19/2011) [Transferred from California Northern on 9/27/2011.]
July 18, 2011 Filing 12 Certification of Interested Entities or Persons by Brittney Cooper (Mukherjee, Ruchira) (Filed on 7/18/2011) Modified on 7/19/2011 (bw, COURT STAFF). [Transferred from California Northern on 9/27/2011.]
July 18, 2011 Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Ruchira Piya Mukherjee (Mukherjee, Ruchira) (Filed on 7/18/2011) [Transferred from California Northern on 9/27/2011.]
July 18, 2011 Filing 10 CONSENT to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Starbucks Corporation. (Curiel, Mark) (Filed on 7/18/2011) Modified on 7/19/2011 (bw, COURT STAFF). [Transferred from California Northern on 9/27/2011.]
July 7, 2011 Filing 9 CONSENT to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Brittney Cooper. (Attachments: # 1 Proof of Service) (Bhowmik, Aparajit) (Filed on 7/7/2011) Modified on 7/7/2011 (bwS, COURT STAFF). [Transferred from California Northern on 9/27/2011.]
July 6, 2011 Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re 1 Notice of Removal, Certificate of Service of Notice to Adverse Party and to Superior Court Clerk of Removal to Federal Court (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A) by Starbucks Corporation (Bollinger, Jeremy) (Filed on 7/6/2011) Modified on 7/7/2011 (bwS, COURT STAFF). [Transferred from California Northern on 9/27/2011.]
July 5, 2011 Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE: 9/13/2011 Case Management Conference reset to 7/26/2011 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 5, 4th Floor, San Jose. Joint Case Management Statement due by 7/19/2011. Each party who has not already done so shall file either a Consent" or "Declination" to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge no later than 7/19/2011. (ofr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/5/2011) [Transferred from California Northern on 9/27/2011.]
July 1, 2011 Filing 6 ADR SCHEDULING ORDER: Case Management Statement due by 9/6/2011. Case Management Conference set for 9/13/2011 02:00 PM in Courtroom 5, 4th Floor, San Jose. (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2011) [Transferred from California Northern on 9/27/2011.]
July 1, 2011 Filing 5 NOTICE of Related Cases by Starbucks Corporation (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2011) [Transferred from California Northern on 9/27/2011.]
July 1, 2011 Filing 4 Certification of Interested Entities or Parties by Starbucks Corporation (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2011) [Transferred from California Northern on 9/27/2011.]
July 1, 2011 Filing 3 Declaration of Jana Rutt in Support of Notice of Removal re 1 filed byStarbucks Corporation. (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2011) [Transferred from California Northern on 9/27/2011.]
July 1, 2011 Filing 2 Declaration of Jeremy F. Bollinger in Support of Notice of Removal re 1 filed by Starbucks Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A to Notice of Removal (Alleged Class Action Complaint), # 2 Exhibit B to Notice of Removal (Answer to Complaint)) (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2011) [Transferred from California Northern on 9/27/2011.]
July 1, 2011 Filing 1 ANSWER to Complaint (Exhibit B to Declaration re 2 ) by Starbucks Corporation. (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2011) Modified on 7/5/2011 (bw, COURT STAFF). [Transferred from California Northern on 9/27/2011.]
July 1, 2011 Filing 1 Alleged Class Action NOTICE OF REMOVAL (NO PROCESS); jury demand; from Superior Court of California, Santa Clara County. Their case number is 111CV201544. (Filing fee $350 receipt number 5461100997). Filed byStarbucks Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet) (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2011) [Transferred from California Northern on 9/27/2011.]
July 1, 2011 CASE DESIGNATED for Electronic Filing. (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2011) [Transferred from California Northern on 9/27/2011.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brittney Cooper v. Starbucks Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Brittney Cooper
Represented By: Aparajit Bhowmik
Represented By: Norman B Blumenthal
Represented By: Ruchira Piya Mukherjee
Represented By: Kyle R Nordrehaug
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Starbucks Corporation
Represented By: Liz Kathryn Bertko
Represented By: Catherine A Conway
Represented By: Mark Royce Curiel
Represented By: Gregory W Knopp
Represented By: Galit A Knotz
Represented By: Jeremy Fine Bollinger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?