Pentair Water Pool and Spa Inc v. Hayward Industries Inc et al
Plaintiff: Pentair Water Pool and Spa Inc
Defendant: Hayward Industries Inc and Hayward Pool Products Inc
Unknown: Mark Boland
Case Number: 2:2011cv10280
Filed: December 13, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Fernando M. Olguin
Presiding Judge: George H Wu
Nature of Suit: Patent

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 18, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 287 JUDGMENT by Judge George H. Wu. IT HEREBY IS ADJUDGED THAT: (a) claims 43, 44, 45 and 47 of the '804 patent are invalid for failure to meet the written description requirement of 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph for the reasons set forth in D.I. 272; questions of fact remain as to whether each of claims 43-47 is invalid for failure to meet the written description requirement of 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph based on additional grounds asserted by Pentair, but those questio ns of fact do not impact the Court's conclusion that claims 43, 44, 45 and 47 are invalid. Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ADJUDGED THAT Pentair is the prevailing party in this action, that Hayward takes nothing from Pentair and that any and all r emaining claims and counterclaims are dismissed as moot or dismissed as per the proposed Order Dismissing Plaintiff's Invalidity Cause of Action re Claim 46 filed on February 13, 2015. (See attached document for details.) (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lom)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pentair Water Pool and Spa Inc v. Hayward Industries Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hayward Industries Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hayward Pool Products Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pentair Water Pool and Spa Inc
Represented By: Antony Michael Novom
Represented By: Kevin R Nowicki
Represented By: Renita S Rathinam
Represented By: Raja N Saliba
Represented By: John B Scherling
Represented By: Brian K Shelton
Represented By: Artem N Sokolov
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Unknown: Mark Boland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?