Pentair Water Pool and Spa Inc v. Hayward Industries Inc et al
||Pentair Water Pool and Spa Inc
||Hayward Industries Inc and Hayward Pool Products Inc
||December 13, 2011
||US District Court for the Central District of California
||Fernando M. Olguin
||George H Wu
|Nature of Suit:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|February 18, 2015
JUDGMENT by Judge George H. Wu. IT HEREBY IS ADJUDGED THAT: (a) claims 43, 44, 45 and 47 of the '804 patent are invalid for failure to meet the written description requirement of 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph for the reasons set forth in D.I. 272; questions of fact remain as to whether each of claims 43-47 is invalid for failure to meet the written description requirement of 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph based on additional grounds asserted by Pentair, but those questio ns of fact do not impact the Court's conclusion that claims 43, 44, 45 and 47 are invalid. Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ADJUDGED THAT Pentair is the prevailing party in this action, that Hayward takes nothing from Pentair and that any and all r emaining claims and counterclaims are dismissed as moot or dismissed as per the proposed Order Dismissing Plaintiff's Invalidity Cause of Action re Claim 46 filed on February 13, 2015. (See attached document for details.) (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lom)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?