Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan et al v. National Fire Systems and Services Inc
| Trustees of the Los Angeles County Electrical Educational and Training Trust Fund, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Health Trust Fund, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Labor-Management Cooperation Committee, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan, Los Angeles Electrical Workers Credit Union, Administrative Maintenance Fund and Contract Compliance Fund |
| National Fire Systems and Services Inc |
| 2:2012cv01365 |
| February 16, 2012 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dale S. Fischer |
| Victor B. Kenton |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
JUDGMENT by Judge Dale S. Fischer, in favor of Administrative Maintenance Fund, Contract Compliance Fund, Los Angeles Electrical Workers Credit Union, Trustees of the Los Angeles County Electrical Educational and Training Trust Fund, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Health Trust Fund against National Fire Systems and Services Inc. See Judgment for specifics. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (dp)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Dale S. Fischer re failure to prosecute. See Minute Order for specifics. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 5/14/2012. (dp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
