808 Holdings LLC v. Collective of January 3, 2012 Sharing Hash et al Featured Case
Plaintiff: 808 Holdings LLC
Defendant: Collective of January 3, 2012 Sharing Hash and Does
Case Number: 2:2012cv02251
Filed: March 16, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Charles F. Eick
Presiding Judge: Christina A. Snyder
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 2, 2012. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 30, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR EARLY DISCOVERY by Judge Christina A. Snyder: IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Application for Early Discovery 9 is GRANTED IN PART. Plaintiff is hereby excused from the meet and confer requirements of Rules 26(d) and 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and may subpoena AT&T d/b/a SBC Internet Services, Clearwire Corporation, Comcast Cable, Qwest Communications, and Verizon Internet Services for the specific purpose of discovering the identities of the subscribers to whom the IP addresses listed in ECF 6 had been assigned at the time the alleged unauthorized distribution of "Brandon and Pierce Unwrapped" occurred. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if served with such a subpoena, AT&T d/b/a SBC Internet Services, Clearwire Corporation, Comcast Cable, Qwest Communications, and Verizon Internet Services shall each: (1) Immediately suspend any process that might delete the information sought by Plaintiff; and (2) Have 21 calendar days from the date of service of the subpoena to: (a) Comply with the notice provision contained in 47 U.S.C. Section 551(c)(2)(B), if the subpoenaed party is a "cable operator" as defined by 27 U.S.C. Section 522(5); and (b) Respond to the subpoena. (gk)
March 29, 2012 Filing 9 First EX PARTE APPLICATION for Discovery regarding leave to take early discovery filed by plaintiff 808 Holdings LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum, # 2 Declaration, # 3 Proposed Order, # 4 Supplement)(Hanigan, Timothy)
March 28, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 08-05 -Related Case- filed. Related Case No: CV 12-02078 CAS(Ex). Case transferred from Magistrate Judge Jay C. Gandhi and Judge John F. Walter to Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge CV 12-02251 CAS(Ex).Signed by Judge Christina A. Snyder (rn)
March 27, 2012 Filing 7 Notice of Withdrawal of Ex Parte Application for Discovery 6 filed by plaintiff 808 Holdings LLC. (Hanigan, Timothy)
March 27, 2012 Filing 6 First EX PARTE APPLICATION for Discovery regarding leave to take early discovery filed by plaintiff 808 Holdings LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum, # 2 Declaration, # 3 Supplement, # 4 Proposed Order)(Hanigan, Timothy)
March 22, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 5 STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter: READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES; Memoranda of Points and Authorities in support of or in opposition to motions shall not exceed 25 pages; replies shall not exceed 12 pages. Counsel are ORDERED to deliver 2 courtesy copies of all documents filed electronically in this action to Chambers. For each document filed electronically, one courtesy copy shall be marked CHAMBERS COPY and the other shall be marked COURTESY COPY. The courtesy copies shall be delivered to Chambers no later than 10:00 a.m. on the next business day after the document was electronically filed (see document for further details). (jp)
March 16, 2012 Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et)
March 16, 2012 Filing 3 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by 808 Holdings LLC. (et)
March 16, 2012 Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff 808 Holdings LLC. (et) (mg).
March 16, 2012 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants Collective of January 3, 2012 Sharing Hash, Does 1 through 10 inclusive. Case assigned to Judge John F. Walter for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Jay C. Gandhi.(Filing fee $ 350 PAID.), filed by Plaintiff 808 Holdings LLC.(et) (mg).
March 16, 2012 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery) 1 as to Defendant Collective of January 3, 2012 Sharing Hash. (et)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: 808 Holdings LLC v. Collective of January 3, 2012 Sharing Hash et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: 808 Holdings LLC
Represented By: Arthur Carvalho, Jr
Represented By: Timothy R Hanigan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Collective of January 3, 2012 Sharing Hash
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?