Sheila Fernandez v. Northwestern Engineering Company et al
| Sheila Fernandez |
| Northwestern Engineering Company, Hills Products Group Inc and Does |
| Jerry Pickett, Roes and Sheila Fernandez |
| Northwestern Engineering Company and Hills Products Group Inc |
| Hills Products Group Inc and Northwestern Engineering Company |
| Sheila Fernandez |
| 2:2012cv02437 |
| March 21, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Christina A. Snyder |
| Andrew J. Wistrich |
| Rent Lease & Ejectment |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
102
STIPULATED JUDGMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder: Upon Stipulation 101 , IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED, ORDERED, and DECREED as follows: Defendants and Counterclaimants NORTHWESTERN ENGINEERING COMPANY and HILLS PRODUCTS GROUP, INC. shall have judgment in its favor on Plaintiff and Counterdefendant SHEILA FERNANDES' Complaint in the sum of $129,473.47 representing holdover damages. (gk)
|
|
Filing
36
MINUTES OF Motion Hearing held before Judge Christina A. Snyder RE: Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim 28 . The Court hereby DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE plaintiff's seventh claim for relief. Plaintiff shall have 30 days to file an amended pleading addressing the deficiencies discussed in this order. Court Reporter: Laura Elias. (gk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
