Aevoe Corp v. Tae Kim et al
Plaintiff: Aevoe Corp
Defendant: Does and Tae Kim
Case Number: 2:2012cv02965
Filed: April 4, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John A Kronstadt
Presiding Judge: Frederick F. Mumm
Nature of Suit: Trademark

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 2, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 14 JUDGMENT by Judge John A Kronstadt, in favor of Aevoe Corp against Tae Kim Related to: Order on Motion for Default Judgment, Motion Hearing,, 12 . Plaintiff AEVEO CORP., is hereby awarded final judgment on its claims for relief against Defendant TAE KIM, in the sum of $15,000.00. Plaintiff is awarded attorneys fees in the amount of $1,500.00 and costs of $487.33. Defendant and any person or entity acting in concert with, or at thedirection of him, including any and all agents, s ervants, employees, partners,assignees, distributors, suppliers, resellers and any others over which he mayexercise control, are hereby restrained and enjoined, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. §1116, from engaging in, directly or indirectly, or authorizin g or assisting any third party to engage in, any of the following activities in the United States and throughout the world. copying, manufacturing, importing, exporting, marketing, sale, offering for sale, distributing or dealing in any product or se rvice that uses, or otherwise making any use of, any of Plaintiffs MOSHI trademarks, and/or any intellectual property that is confusingly or substantially similar to, or that constitutes a colorable imitation of, any of Plaintiffs MOSHI trademarks, w hether such use is as, on, in or in connection with any trademark, service mark, trade name, logo, design, Internet use, website, domain name, metatags, advertising, promotions, solicitations, commercial exploitation, television, webbased or any other program, or any product or service, or otherwise. (See order for further details0. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (shb)
June 21, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 10 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL RE LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge John A Kronstadt. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 7/6/2012. (vdr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Aevoe Corp v. Tae Kim et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tae Kim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Aevoe Corp
Represented By: Marcus F Chaney
Represented By: Christopher Dain Johnson
Represented By: Hung Q Pham
Represented By: Christopher Q Pham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?