Steven Cisneros v. Matthew Cates
Petitioner: Steven Cisneros
Respondent: Matthew Cates
Case Number: 2:2012cv03147
Filed: April 11, 2012
Court: U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Percy Anderson
Presiding Judge: Carla Woehrle
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 16, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 48 JUDGMENT by Judge Percy Anderson, Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations 47 . It is hereby adjudged that the petition for a writ of habeascorpus is denied. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (yb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Steven Cisneros v. Matthew Cates
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Matthew Cates
Represented By: Daniel Chi-Sum Chang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Steven Cisneros
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?