United States of America v. One 27 Inch Mac Apple Computer Featured Case
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: One 27 Inch Mac Apple Computer
Case Number: 2:2012cv04684
Filed: May 29, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Frederick F. Mumm
Presiding Judge: John F. Walter
Nature of Suit: Forfeit/Penalty: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2013. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 18, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 11 SCHEDULING AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. The purpose of this Order is to notify the parties and their counsel of the deadlines and the schedule that will govern this action. SEE THE LAST PAGE OF THIS ORDER FOR THE SPECIFIED DATES. (jp)
September 18, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER VACATING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: The Court has reviewed the parties' Joint Rule 26(f) Report and finds that a Scheduling Conference is not necessary. The hearing on October 1, 2012 is vacated and taken off calendar. A Scheduling and Case Management Order will issue. Any unserved DOE defendants are dismissed at this time. ORDER/REFERRAL TO ADR:The Court, having considered the parties Request: ADR Procedure Selection, the Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program, or the report submitted by the parties pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) and Civil L.R. 26-1, hereby: ORDERS this case referred to ADR PROCEDURE NO. 1: Magistrate Judge Assigned to the Case for such settlement proceedings as the Judge may conduct or direct. The ADR proceeding is to be completed no later than: March 4, 2013. CC: ADR, Magistrate Judge Mumm THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY.(sr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
September 17, 2012 Filing 9 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 1-2 days, filed by Plaintiff United States of America.. (Welk, Steven)
August 10, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge John F. Walter: Counsel are hereby notified that a Scheduling Conference has been set for 10/1/2012 at 8:30 AM before Judge John F. Walter. Lead Trial Counsel shall attend all proceedings before this Court, including the Scheduling Conference. Counsel are directed to comply with Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 26-1 in a timely fashion and to file a Joint Report, on or before 9/17/2012. (jp)
August 10, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 7 SELF-REPRESENTATION ORDER by Judge John F. Walter that One or more of the parties to this action has elected to appear pro se. Persons appearing before this Court are not required to retain the services of a lawyer or obtain the advice of counsel. Individual litigants may represent themselves pro se, but corporations and associations must be represented by counsel (see document for further details). Should you fail to contradict the moving party with counter-affidavits, declarations or other evidence, the moving party evidence may be taken as the truth, and final judgment may be entered against you without a trial, thus ending your case. (jp)
July 19, 2012 Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint 1 filed by defendant Darrius Sutton.(jp)
July 5, 2012 Filing 5 SERVICE OF SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT Executed by Plaintiff United States of America, by Publication on 06/04/2012 and 06/05/2012 upon Defendant One 27 Inch Mac Apple Computer last date of publication 7/3/2012, answer due 7/23/2012. Publication was made in the www.forfeiture.gov. (Welk, Steven)
June 29, 2012 Filing 4 Contesting of Forfeiture filed by Claimant Darrius Sutton. (jp)
June 7, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 3 STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter: READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES; Memoranda of Points and Authorities in support of or in opposition to motions shall not exceed 25 pages; replies shall not exceed 12 pages. Counsel are ORDERED to deliver 2 courtesy copies of all documents filed electronically in this action to Chambers. For each document filed electronically, one courtesy copy shall be marked CHAMBERS COPY and the other shall be marked COURTESY COPY. The courtesy copies shall be delivered to Chambers no later than 10:00 a.m. on the next business day after the document was electronically filed (see document for further details). (jp)
May 29, 2012 Filing 2 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et)
May 29, 2012 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendant One 27 Inch Mac Apple Computer. Case assigned to Judge John F. Walter for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. (Filing fee $ 350: NO FEE REQUIRED.), filed by Plaintiff United States of America. (et) (mg).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. One 27 Inch Mac Apple Computer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: One 27 Inch Mac Apple Computer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Steven R Welk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?