Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Ameneik M Theus et al
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company |
Ajaun Theus, Ameneik M Theus and D. H. V. |
2:2012cv07659 |
September 6, 2012 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Michael W Fitzgerald |
Jay C. Gandhi |
Insurance |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 40 ORDER FOR: (1) PLAINTIFF METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY'S DISCHARGE AND DISMISSAL; (2) PERMANENT INJUNCTION; AND (3) METLIFES RECOVERY OF REASONABLE ATTORNEYS' FEES by Judge Fernando M. Olguin that Defendants Ameneik M. Theus, Ajaun Th eus, D.H.V. and David Henry, and each of them, their agents, attorneys or assigns, are enjoined and restrained from instituting any suit at law or equity, or action of any kind whatsoever, against MetLife and the Los Angeles Unified School District w ith respect to the life insurance benefits that became payable upon the death of Sharlene Robinson ("Life Insurance Benefits); MetLife be dismissed with prejudice from this action and that MetLife and the Los Angeles Unified School District be discharged of all liability with respect to the Life Insurance Benefits; and MetLife be awarded the sum of $5,000 as its reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred in this action. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp) |
Filing 9 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL RE: LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 2/4/2013. (vdr) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.