Kiran Meettook v. Ebene Cybercity Hotel Ltd et al
Plaintiff: Kiran Meettook
Defendant: Ebene Cybercity Hotel Ltd, SKC Surat and Co Ltd, Bhunjun Group, Industrial Zone La Tour Koenig, Pointe aux sable Maurititus, TN Gaya Ltd, Soodarsun Ltd, AME Holdings Ltd, Crown Properties Ltd, Alaska Investment and Betonix Ltd
Case Number: 2:2012cv08660
Filed: October 9, 2012
Court: U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Jesus G Bernal
Referring Judge: Frederick F Mumm
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2015. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 6, 2015 Filing 19 JUDGMENT by Judge Jesus G. Bernal related to: Minutes of In Chambers Order, #18 . IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiffs Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Court orders that such judgment be entered. The Clerk is directed to close the case. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (iva)
August 6, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 18 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS Order DISMISSING the Complaint WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (See document for specifics.) (iva)
April 18, 2014 Filing 17 RESPONSE to Order of April 1st 2014 #16 filed by Plaintiff Kiran Meettook. (adu)
April 1, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 16 MINUTE ORDER to Show Cause Re: Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution IN CHAMBERS by Judge Jesus G. Bernal: (see document image for further details). For the reasons described above, Plaintiffs Certificate of Service and Response failed to satisfy the Courts prior orders to show cause. Moreover, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), the summons and complaint must be properly served within 120 days after the complaint is filed, in other words by February 6, 2013. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). For the final time, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to show cause, in writing, no later than April 18, 2014, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Failure to respond to this Order or a response which does not demonstrate proper service upon Defendants may result in the dismissal of this action. IT IS SO ORDERED. (ad)
June 28, 2013 Filing 15 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE filed by Plaintiff Kiran Meettook #14 (am)
June 11, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MINUTE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION IN CHAMBERS by Judge Jesus G. Bernal:( Response to Order to Show Cause due by 6/27/2013.) (mrgo)
June 3, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 13 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (mga)
March 1, 2013 Filing 12 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS; ORDER by Deputy Clerk of Court: Document is stricken. Plaintiff shall file a proper proof of service, followed by a request for entry of default by clerk. RE REQUEST for Default Judgment #10 . (ad)
February 1, 2013 Filing 11 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY Re: REQUEST for Default Judgment against defendants Ebene Cybercity Hotel Ltd 18 Bhunjun Group Betonix Ltd 19 TN Gaya Ltd 20 Soordarsun Ltd Arne Holdings Ltd 21 Crown Properties Ltd 22 Alaska Investments Veekram Bhunjun; Amal Bhunjun; Anoopam Gaya; Shyam S #10 . The Clerk cannot enter the requested relief as No Entry of Default on file. No declaration as required by F.R.Civ.P 55(b). The name of the person for which Default Judgment is requested does not exactly match the person named in the complaint. (am)
January 25, 2013 Filing 10 *****DOCUMENT STRICKEN PURSUANT TO ORDER (DOC. NO.12)***** REQUEST for Default Judgment against defendants Ebene Cybercity Hotel Ltd; Bhunjun Group; Betonix Ltd; TN Gaya Ltd Soordarsun Ltd; Arne Holdings Ltd 21 Crown Properties Ltd; Alaska Investments; Veekram Bhunjun; Amal Bhunjun; Anoopam Gaya; Shyam Surat; All other Shareholders of Ebene Cybercity Hotel Ltd filed by plaintiff Kiran Meettook. (am) Modified on 3/6/2013 (ad).
January 7, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER OF THE CHIEF JUDGE (#13-008) approved by Chief Judge George H. King. Pursuant to the recommended procedure adopted by the Court for the CREATION OF CALENDAR of Judge Jesus G. Bernal, this case is transferred from Judge John F. Walter to the calendar of Judge Jesus G Bernal for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge CV 12-08660 JGB(FFMx). (rn)
January 7, 2013 Filing 8 NOTICE of Intention to Prosecute, filed by Plaintiff Kiran Meettook. (kbr)
January 7, 2013 Filing 7 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Kiran Meettook, upon Defendant Ebene Cybercity Hotel Ltd served on 12/31/2012, answer due 1/21/2013i in compliance with statute not specified by mail service. Original Summons not returned. (kbr)
January 7, 2013 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery) #1 as to defendant Ebene Cybercity Hotel Ltd. (kbr)
January 4, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge John F. Walter. Plaintiff is ordered to show cause, in writing, no later than January 14, 2013, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. (kbr)
October 12, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SELF-REPRESENTATION ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge John F. Walter. (cb)
October 12, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 4 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge John F. Walter. (cb)
October 9, 2012 Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed.(ghap)
October 9, 2012 Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Kiran Meettook. (ghap)
October 9, 2012 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants AME Holdings Ltd, Alaska Investment, Betonix Ltd, Bhunjun Group, Crown Properties Ltd, Ebene Cybercity Hotel Ltd, Industrial Zone La Tour Koenig, Pointe aux sable Maurititus, SKC Surat and Co Ltd, Soodarsun Ltd, TN Gaya Ltd.Case assigned to Judge John F. Walter for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm.(Filing fee $ 350:PAID), filed by plaintiff Kiran Meettook. (NO SUMMONS ISSUED ON 10/9/12)(ghap) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/8/2013: #1 Sumons) (kbr).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kiran Meettook v. Ebene Cybercity Hotel Ltd et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kiran Meettook
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ebene Cybercity Hotel Ltd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SKC Surat and Co Ltd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bhunjun Group
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Industrial Zone La Tour Koenig
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pointe aux sable Maurititus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TN Gaya Ltd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Soodarsun Ltd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AME Holdings Ltd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Crown Properties Ltd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alaska Investment
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Betonix Ltd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?