Eddie Jerome Mills v. Phillip Guttierrez
Petitioner: Eddie Jerome Mills
Respondent: Phillip Guttierrez
Case Number: 2:2012cv09473
Filed: November 5, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Michael W Fitzgerald
Presiding Judge: Frederick F. Mumm
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 19, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald: IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered dismissing this action without prejudice. (jm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Eddie Jerome Mills v. Phillip Guttierrez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Phillip Guttierrez
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By: Kathleen R Unger
Represented By: Dorothy Kim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Eddie Jerome Mills
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?