Underwood and Wong Produce Inc et al v. F and F Business Management Services Inc et al
||Morita Produce Co Inc and Underwood and Wong Produce Inc
||F and F Business Management Services Inc and Farshad Hedayati
||November 27, 2012
||US District Court for the Central District of California
||Margaret M. Morrow
|Nature of Suit:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|September 10, 2013
JUDGMENT FOR PLAINTIFFS by Judge Margaret M. Morrow, in favor of Morita Produce Co Inc, Underwood and Wong Produce Inc against F and F Business Management Services Inc, Farshad Hedayati: On June 13, 2009, Underwood and Wong Produce, Inc. and Mori ta Produce Co., Inc. filed a motion for entry of default judgment under Rule 55(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. On September 10, 2013, the court issued an order granting plaintiffs' motion. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED 1. That plaintiffs recover unpaid principal in the amount of $83,238.60 ($40,343.20 to Underwood and $42,895.40 to Morita); 2. That plaintiffs recover prejudgment interest in the amount of $22,879.76 ($10,996.63 to Underwo od and $11,883.13 to Morita); 3. That plaintiffs recover attorneys' fees in the amount of $5,722,37; 4. That plaintiffs recover costs in the amount of $863.64; 4. That the judgment bear post-judgment interest at a rate of 18% per year; and 5. That the action be, and it hereby is, dismissed. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bm)
|June 20, 2013
ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 9 by Judge Margaret M. Morrow. (ah)
|June 6, 2013
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Margaret M. Morrow. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 6/13/2013. (ah)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?