Keith Masato Tamashiro v. Michael J Astrue

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Keith Masato Tamashiro v. Michael J Astrue

Keith Masato Tamashiro v. Michael J Astrue

Plaintiff:	Keith Masato Tamashiro
Defendant:	Michael J Astrue
Case Number:	2:2012cv10286
Filed:	December 3, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Charles F. Eick
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: DIWC/DIWW

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 10, 2014	Filing 34 ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. Re: Stipulation for Award of EAJA Fees, 31 . Based upon the parties' Stipulation for Award of Attorney's Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act and Costs (Stipulation), IT IS ORDERED that attorney fees be paid in the amount of Five Thousand Five Hundred Fifty and 00/100 Dollars ($5,550.00), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and costs be paid in the amount of Fifty-One and 81/100 Dollars ($51.81), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1920, subject to the terms of the above referenced Stipulation. (rp)
September 24, 2013	Filing 30 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. It is Hereby Adjudged that the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration is reversed in part and the matter is remanded for further administrative action consistent with the Opinion filed concurrently herewith. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (sp)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 10, 2014

Filing 34 ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. Re: Stipulation for Award of EAJA Fees, 31 . Based upon the parties' Stipulation for Award of Attorney's Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act and Costs (Stipulation), IT IS ORDERED that attorney fees be paid in the amount of Five Thousand Five Hundred Fifty and 00/100 Dollars ($5,550.00), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and costs be paid in the amount of Fifty-One and 81/100 Dollars ($51.81), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1920, subject to the terms of the above referenced Stipulation. (rp)

September 24, 2013

Filing 30 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. It is Hereby Adjudged that the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration is reversed in part and the matter is remanded for further administrative action consistent with the Opinion filed concurrently herewith. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (sp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Keith Masato Tamashiro v. Michael J Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By:	Susan L Smith
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Keith Masato Tamashiro
Represented By:	Patricia L McCabe
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?