Derrice Lee Porter v. Greg Lewis
Petitioner: Derrice Lee Porter
Respondent: Greg Lewis
Case Number: 2:2012cv10834
Filed: December 19, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Robert N. Block
Presiding Judge: Otis D. Wright
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 22, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 26 JUDGMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II, Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations 25 . IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that the First Amended Petition is denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mt)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Derrice Lee Porter v. Greg Lewis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Greg Lewis
Represented By: Michael Robert Johnsen
Represented By: Jonathan Matthew Krauss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Derrice Lee Porter
Represented By: Franklin Peters, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?