Gibson Guitar Corp v. Viacom International Inc et al
Gibson Guitar Corp |
Does, John Hornby Skewes and Co Ltd and Viacom International Inc |
2:2012cv10870 |
December 20, 2012 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Dean D. Pregerson |
Andrew J. Wistrich |
Trademark |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 95 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR SANCTIONS 88 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS) (vv) |
Filing 70 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION 63 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated) . (lc) Modified on 11/5/2013 (lc). |
Filing 56 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION 48 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson . (lc). Modified on 8/6/2013. (lc). |
Filing 51 ORDER by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: denying 40 Viacom Motion for Attorney Fees. (lc). Modified on 7/18/2013. (lc). |
Filing 36 ORDER granting 30 Viacoms Motion to Dismiss with prejudice by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. (lc). Modified on 5/17/2013 (lc). |
Filing 24 ORDER GRANTING VIACOM INTERNATIONAL MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: The court finds that the Complaint in its current form fails to state a claim for relief. The motion to dismiss under Rule12(b)(6) is GRANTED with leave to amend. Any amendment must be made within ten days of the date of this order. (lc). Modified on 3/8/2013. (lc). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.