Progressive Produce Corporation v. Wild West Produce LLC et al
||Progressive Produce Corporation
||Wild West Produce LLC, Mario G Luera and Amy Luera
||January 30, 2013
||US District Court for the Central District of California
||Ronald S.W. Lew
||Patrick J. Walsh
|Nature of Suit:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|May 9, 2013
ORDER Re: PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT 15 by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew: Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment is GRANTED. SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER AND COMPLETE DETAILS. (jre)
|April 12, 2013
IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. The file in this case lacks the papers that would show it is being timely prosecuted, as reflected below. Accordingly, the Cour t, on its own motion, hereby orders plaintiff (s) to show cause in writing no later than April 24, 2013, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will accept one of the following, if it is filed on or before the above date, as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted diligently: Defendants' Answer to Complaint or Plaintiffs Request for Entry of Default on defendants. SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER AND COMPLETE DETAILS. (jre)
|February 8, 2013
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff show cause why this case is within the Court's jurisdiction. Plaintiff has no later than March 4, 2013, to respond, demonstrating why this case should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (jre)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?