James H Donell v. Mojgan Jafari
Plaintiff: James H Donell
Defendant: Mojgan Jafari
Case Number: 2:2013cv01473
Filed: February 28, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John E. McDermott
Presiding Judge: Dean D. Pregerson
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 17, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. Based on the Stipulation dismissing case 8 , entered into by the parties as a result of a settlement, and good cause appearing, therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED this case is dismissed without prejudice. Case Terminated. Made JS-6., (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (cch)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: James H Donell v. Mojgan Jafari
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mojgan Jafari
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James H Donell
Represented By: Peter Alan Davidson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?