In re Chang Sup Han
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|July 8, 2013
ORDER that the judgment of the Bankruptcy Court is REVERSED and the case is REMANDED to the U. S. Bankruptcy Court Case number: 2:11-bk-30025-RK, Adversary number: 2:11-ap-2632-RK., for further proceedings consistent with this order by Judge Otis D. Wright, II, re Order to Remand Case to Bankruptcy Court 45 . (lc). Modified on 7/8/2013 (lc).
|July 3, 2013
TENTATIVE ORDER: The judgment of the Bankruptcy Court is REVERSED and the case is REMANDED to the U. S. Bankruptcy Court Case number: 2:11-bk-30025-RK, Adversary number: 2:11-ap-2632-RK., for further proceedings consistent with this order by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.). (lc). Modified on 7/3/2013 (lc).
|April 11, 2013
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. Under Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 8006, an appellant must file within 14 days after a notice of appeal, (1) a designation of items to be included in the record on appea l, and (2) a statement of issues to be presented. To the Court's knowledge, Appellant has not done this in this appeal. The Notice of Appeal wasfiled on February 25, 2013. (ECF No. 2 .) Appellant Brewster is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writ ing no later than April 22, 2013, why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with the applicable rules. No hearing will be held. Failure to timely respond to this order will result in dismissal of this appeal. (jre)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?