Andrew Felton Odom v. Martin Hoshino
Andrew Felton Odom |
Martin Hoshino |
2:2013cv01630 |
March 7, 2013 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Percy Anderson |
Jacqueline Chooljian |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 60 JUDGMENT by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell. Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations of the United Magistrate Judge 59 . IT IS ADJUDGED that the petition is denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (nbo) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Andrew Felton Odom v. Martin Hoshino | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Martin Hoshino | |
Represented By: | Roberta Lynn Davis |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Andrew Felton Odom | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.