Donald C Bayer et al v. Cabot Investment Properties LLC et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|June 21, 2013
ORDER Re: Plaintiffs' Second Motion for Entry of Stipulated Default Judgment 19 by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew: Default judgment shall be entered against Defendants Cabot Investment Properties, LLC; Cabot Creekside Acquisition, LLC; and Carlton P. Cabot. The Court enters default judgment against Defendants as follows: 1. The Court GRANTS Plaintiffs' request for damages in the amount of $1,000,000, as Plaintiffs and Defendants stipulated in their Settlement Agreement, signed in June 2012. 2. The Court also GRANTS Plaintiffs request for pre-judgment and post-judgment interest, at the rate prescribed under 28 U.S.C. 1961. (jre)
|April 12, 2013
IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. The file in this case lacks the papers that would show it is being timely prosecuted, as reflected below. Accordingly, the Cour t, on its own motion, hereby orders plaintiff (s) to show cause in writing no later than April 24, 2013, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will accept o ne of the following, if it is filed on or before the above date, as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted diligently: Defendant's Answer to Complaint or Plaintiff's Request for Entry of Default on defendant. SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER AND COMPLETE INFORMATION. (jre)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?